Mvp

[Leurfe 45]

Long story short: I don't like how the MVP is assigned in online matches, I think it should go to the player who makes more points, not the one who gets the kills, It's just unfair to me.

 

Is making a change possible? Seriously, It's really annoying seeing people do absolutely nothing than throwing grenades or putting other people on fire and then getting the MVP.

 

Does someone agree with me?

[CmereSweetHeart 17]

It's not the kills, but the hit by example:You punch someone 2 times and he throw a grenade at you 1 time.

 

You get MVP.

Edited May 5, 2013 by CmereSweetHeart

[jakester279 2]

Long story short: I don't like how the MVP is assigned in online matches, I think it should go to the player who makes more points, not the one who gets the kills, It's just unfair to me.

 

Is making a change possible? Seriously, It's really annoying seeing people do absolutely nothing than throwing grenades or putting other people on fire and then getting the MVP.

 

Does someone agree with me?

its called most violent player though

[Leurfe 45]

It's not the kills, but the hit by example:You punch someone 2 times and he throw a grenade at you 1 time.

 

You get MVP.

 

Uh ok, well, that's basically the same...

 

Long story short: I don't like how the MVP is assigned in online matches, I think it should go to the player who makes more points, not the one who gets the kills, It's just unfair to me.

 

Is making a change possible? Seriously, It's really annoying seeing people do absolutely nothing than throwing grenades or putting other people on fire and then getting the MVP.

 

Does someone agree with me?

its called most violent player though

 

Ahahah

 

[BigSilverBear 9]

I'm not a fan of it either but it is what it is. I can't see them changing it.

[BiPolarBear 121]

I wish you got points for using the fan or vacuum to push/pull someone or use their weapons against them...

[IndustrialKnight 889]

Think about it. Will the one gem really help you.

[Leurfe 45]

Think about it. Will the one gem really help you.

 

Do you really think I would open a topic for a gem? It's for principle.

 

Anyway, I want to play your game: one gem multiplied one thousand matches equals one thousand gems, so... yes it would really help me.

Not to mention if I lose the match, with the MVP I would get two gems instead of one, that's the double. It would help.

 

Anyway I don't care about that one gem, It really pisses me off seeing people camping and/or not helping and getting Most Valuable Player because they spammed grenades all the time, that doesn't motivate me to play fair when I'm 1 vs 2, if I'm losing, what keeps me from ignoring the match and just follow my enemies and hit them?

[IndustrialKnight 889]

Think about it. Will the one gem really help you.

 

Do you really think I would open a topic for a gem? It's for principle.

 

Anyway, I want to play your game: one gem multiplied one thousand matches equals one thousand gems, so... yes it would really help me.

Not to mention if I lose the match, with the MVP I would get two gems instead of one, that's the double. It would help.

 

Anyway I don't care about that one gem, It really pisses me off seeing people camping and/or not helping and getting Most Valuable Player because they spammed grenades all the time, that doesn't motivate me to play fair when I'm 1 vs 2, if I'm losing, what keeps me from ignoring the match and just follow my enemies and hit them?

A tip is to play their game, throw grenades, blow their projectiles with fan, you may not get the MVP but you will most likely win so it's either they get 4 and you get 2 or you get 4 and they get 2, and maybe you might get 5. No need to write 3 paragraphs scolding me about it. I went through similar scenarios and it sucks I know. There's always pluses and minuses to all online games.

[BiPolarBear 121]

Sadly most minuses are the players themselves

[Jaredman89 120]

I have all heads so I really do not worry about gem boosting and gem losing. It is really not hard to get all heads anyways. I did it in like 2 weeks or less of release.

[Leurfe 45]

I have all heads so I really do not worry about gem boosting and gem losing. It is really not hard to get all heads anyways. I did it in like 2 weeks or less of release.

 

Of course, I'm not doing it for the gems, I have all the heads too, I just want to play fair and have fun, It really really really makes me don't want to play anymore when I find people playing dirty, really.

 

I just wanted something to encourage people to make points instead of being jerks, I found a lot of good players not quitting in 2 v 1 situation and always playing fair, but I found way more players sitting on the basket, standing on your head all the time on color the world or leaving the match because they're failing the time challenge.

[Jaredman89 120]

I have all heads so I really do not worry about gem boosting and gem losing. It is really not hard to get all heads anyways. I did it in like 2 weeks or less of release.

 

Of course, I'm not doing it for the gems, I have all the heads too, I just want to play fair and have fun, It really really really makes me don't want to play anymore when I find people playing dirty, really.

 

I just wanted something to encourage people to make points instead of being jerks, I found a lot of good players not quitting in 2 v 1 situation and always playing fair, but I found way more players sitting on the basket, standing on your head all the time on color the world or leaving the match because they're failing the time challenge.

True

[SIG96 6]

I have to say I agree... if what I gathered correctly is that the way MVP is set up, people pretty much ignore the objective, and play cheap simply going for that one extra gem, title, or both. Last thing I need are more scrubs trying to get MVP by just spamming grenades or fan, I have already avoided a LOT of people when it comes to Xbox Live preference.

[Guest Walexarem]

The sad thing about multiplayer games is that good, fair players are usually far outnumbered by bad, unfair players. Broken game mechanics like the MVP award always causes douchery sadly. It's a bit like Armor Lock or the Revenant glitch in Halo: Reach.

Edited May 6, 2013 by Walexarem

[Ten Bears 6]

MVP is overrated. Its about the win.

I think we can all agree that a good teammate/good opponents are much more important than who punched people more.

Edited May 6, 2013 by Ten Bears

[Leurfe 45]

MVP is overrated. Its about the win.

I think we can all agree that a good teammate/good opponents are much more important than who punched people more.

 

Exactly, then why the teammate who spams grenades from my basket should be considered the best player?

[CmereSweetHeart 17]

It's not the kills, but the hit by example:You punch someone 2 times and he throw a grenade at you 1 time.

 

You get MVP.

 

Uh ok, well, that's basically the same...

 

> 

Long story short: I don't like how the MVP is assigned in online matches, I think it should go to the player who makes more points, not the one who gets the kills, It's just unfair to me.

 

Is making a change possible? Seriously, It's really annoying seeing people do absolutely nothing than throwing grenades or putting other people on fire and then getting the MVP.

 

Does someone agree with me?

its called most violent player though

 

Ahahah

 

 

 

Well when you punch him 1 time YOU DON'T KILL HIM.

 

It's different.

[Atmosbreak 1]

Long story short: I don't like how the MVP is assigned in online matches, I think it should go to the player who makes more points, not the one who gets the kills, It's just unfair to me.

 

Is making a change possible? Seriously, It's really annoying seeing people do absolutely nothing than throwing grenades or putting other people on fire and then getting the MVP.

 

Does someone agree with me?

its called most violent player though

I used to be a little let down when I could score well over half the points in a BBall game and not get MVP. But the V standing for violent makes a lot more sense. Even with the overall themes of the game.

 

I'm a bit happier if this is the case, but I think it should be more clear in the game.

[Leurfe 45]

 

It's not the kills, but the hit by example:You punch someone 2 times and he throw a grenade at you 1 time.

 

You get MVP.

 

Uh ok, well, that's basically the same...

 

>> 

Long story short: I don't like how the MVP is assigned in online matches, I think it should go to the player who makes more points, not the one who gets the kills, It's just unfair to me.

 

Is making a change possible? Seriously, It's really annoying seeing people do absolutely nothing than throwing grenades or putting other people on fire and then getting the MVP.

 

Does someone agree with me?

its called most violent player though

 

Ahahah

 

 

 

Well when you punch him 1 time YOU DON'T KILL HIM.

 

It's different.

 

 

What I meant is that also kills, hits with mines, grenades, anything count as hits, if the problem was people punching I wouldn't even have written here.

[Lindsay 124]

MVP does indeed stand for Most Violent Player. 

[BloodyKILLER15 5]

They should add different awards like Most laziest player in the game or Most Cooperation done. Most Work done